Firstly, sorry about the blurry bits, I'm still not pro This is the male tiger at my zoo ( I FINALLY got pics of them which is a big deal because I never get them) It was feeding time for him though and he was nice enough to eat in front of the window for me
Photography is often described (fondly) as "painting with light," but it's really not at all similar. Many situations, particularly involving living animals, take a lot of patience. This photo is a classic example of snapping at the right moment (when any other would not have had anywhere near the same, powerful effect).
Vision: The passive look on the tiger's face contradicts the presumably carnal nature of his instinct. He looks like a giant house cat munching on a treat--but the shape of his body and the position of his head exemplify power and majesty. His eyes appear to be looking into the camera, and thus directly at the person viewing the photo: you can almost see what he must be thinking. The image itself is powerful in that regard, but certain factors detract from that power. The tire in the background and the gray block that appears to be a cement slab at the left edge and behind are the main culprits. The tire could be cropped--the slab, probably not, but it's less visible anyway. The photo's color is also a bit dull; maybe consider touching it up, brightening it, and increasing contrast.
Originality: Tigers are renowned creatures, and as such are popular targets of cameras. He's a zoo tiger chowing down a treat: but more importantly (and unlike most of your other work), you can *tell* he's a zoo tiger. Originality is hurt by that, badly: the photo looks very similar to thousands of house cat portraits across the internet. Still, not many people have regular access to zoos with tigers: it might not be the most impressive way to pick up originality points, but it still results in an image people can appreciate for being something they don't see every day.
Technique: The color I've already mentioned. The tire and cement block really weren't avoidable. I wouldn't count them as part of your technique. But there is a problem with the photo that you're already aware you made: camera shake, it looks like. That's just something you learn to correct with experience. Sadly, there's nothing you can do to fix it in post-processing.
Impact: Despite the issues I've mentioned, the tiger is a beautiful, intense, and rare creature, and the photo succeeds at impact mostly by virtue of that fact. Further, the expression on his face is priceless, and he's difficult to ignore with his jaws open slightly the way they are, ready to bite down on his treat. Without thinking too much into it, this is a powerful image--minus half a star only because the camera shake sort of dulls the intensity, if you see how I mean.
Overall, the tiger himself looks great (bar the camera shake). The image's major drawbacks in my opinion are the weak background and the dull colors. Still a powerful image. Nice catch.
New deals posted everyday, starting Black Friday and running through the holiday season! No hassles, no lines - just awesome savings on art, deviantWEAR, Premium Memberships and more!
DeviantART is counting down to its 100 millionth deviation! Join in on the fun and take a look back at some of the most noteworthy deviations we've seen along the way. The deviant who uploads the 100 millionth deviation could win a special prize, too. Hurry, we're going to hit the 100 million mark soon!
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it.
Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article. In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
^Ikue has been a devious member of our community for almost 7 years and in this time he has proven to be nothing short of dedicated and devoted. Whilst volunteering his time over the last 22 months as a Gallery Moderator within the Community Relations Team, Chris has brought the Vector gallery and many vector artists directly into the spotlight. ^Ikue's commitment to the community is evident in everything he touches and you can always find him reaching out to others with an encouraging word. Chris is a natural leader with a vibrant and empathic personality, and is a role model for deviants everywhere. It's ev... Read More
Critiques
Vision: The passive look on the tiger's face contradicts the presumably carnal nature of his instinct. He looks like a giant house cat munching on a treat--but the shape of his body and the position of his head exemplify power and majesty. His eyes appear to be looking into the camera, and thus directly at the person viewing the photo: you can almost see what he must be thinking. The image itself is powerful in that regard, but certain factors detract from that power. The tire in the background and the gray block that appears to be a cement slab at the left edge and behind are the main culprits. The tire could be cropped--the slab, probably not, but it's less visible anyway. The photo's color is also a bit dull; maybe consider touching it up, brightening it, and increasing contrast.
Originality: Tigers are renowned creatures, and as such are popular targets of cameras. He's a zoo tiger chowing down a treat: but more importantly (and unlike most of your other work), you can *tell* he's a zoo tiger. Originality is hurt by that, badly: the photo looks very similar to thousands of house cat portraits across the internet. Still, not many people have regular access to zoos with tigers: it might not be the most impressive way to pick up originality points, but it still results in an image people can appreciate for being something they don't see every day.
Technique: The color I've already mentioned. The tire and cement block really weren't avoidable. I wouldn't count them as part of your technique. But there is a problem with the photo that you're already aware you made: camera shake, it looks like. That's just something you learn to correct with experience. Sadly, there's nothing you can do to fix it in post-processing.
Impact: Despite the issues I've mentioned, the tiger is a beautiful, intense, and rare creature, and the photo succeeds at impact mostly by virtue of that fact. Further, the expression on his face is priceless, and he's difficult to ignore with his jaws open slightly the way they are, ready to bite down on his treat. Without thinking too much into it, this is a powerful image--minus half a star only because the camera shake sort of dulls the intensity, if you see how I mean.
Overall, the tiger himself looks great (bar the camera shake). The image's major drawbacks in my opinion are the weak background and the dull colors. Still a powerful image. Nice catch.
Previous PageNext PageThank you for your Critique
You are not logged in.